HackerPapers

arXiv:2408.12449cs.NI

Looking AT the Blue Skies of Bluesky

Leonhard Balduf, Saidu Sokoto, Onur Ascigil, Gareth Tyson, Björn Scheuermann, Maciej Korczyński, Ignacio Castro, Michał Król

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The pitfalls of centralized social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter/X, have led to concerns about control, transparency, and accountability. Decentralized social networks have emerged as a result with the goal of empowering users. These decentralized approaches come with their own tradeoffs, and therefore multiple architectures exist. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale analysis of Bluesky, a prominent decentralized microblogging platform. In contrast to alternative approaches (e.g. Mastodon), Bluesky decomposes and opens the key functions of the platform into subcomponents that can be provided by third party stakeholders. We collect a comprehensive dataset covering all the key elements of Bluesky, study user activity and assess the diversity of providers for each sub-components.

arXiv comments
To be presented at IMC'24
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.NINetworking and Internet Architecture cs.SISocial and Information Networks

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Mar 2026 to Mar 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Blacksky AppView 1 comment
    • Agreed, in theory all participants are equal and being banned by one participant shouldn't lock you out of a decentralized network. In practice, the vast majority of handles (98.9% as of 2024) are under bsky.social [1]. Yes, alternative PDS providers exist, but if the default…

      8cvor6j844qw_d6View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.