<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.10811/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.10811/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Beyond English-Centric LLMs: What Language Do Multilingual Language Models Think in? — mentioned by mbowcut2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44713256</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2408.10811:44713256</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 17:39:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You can, and there has been some interesting work done with it. The technique is called LogitLens, and basically you pass intermediate embeddings through the LMHead to get logits corresponding to tokens. In this paper they use it to investigate whether LLMs have a language bias, i.e. does GPT &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; in English? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.10811 One problem with this technique is that the model wasn&amp;#x27;t trained with intermediate layers being mapped to logits in the first place, so it&amp;#x27;s not clear why the LMHead should be able to map them to anything sensible. But alas, like everything in DL…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.10811/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
