HackerPapers

arXiv:2408.08513astro-ph.HE

Arecibo Wow! I: An Astrophysical Explanation for the Wow! Signal

Abel Méndez, Kevin Ortiz Ceballos, Jorge I. Zuluaga

Abstract

The Ohio State University Big Ear radio telescope detected in 1977 the Wow! Signal, one of the most famous and intriguing signals of extraterrestrial origin. Characterized by its strong relative intensity and narrow bandwidth near the 1420 MHz hydrogen line, its source has never been detected again despite numerous follow-up attempts. Arecibo Wow! is a new technosignature project using archived data from the Arecibo Observatory. Here we present our first results of drift scans made between February and May 2020 at 1420 MHz. The methods, frequency, and bandwidth of these observations are similar to those used to detect the Wow! Signal. However, our observations are more sensitive, have better temporal resolution, and include polarization measurements. We report the detection of narrowband signals (10 kHz) near the hydrogen line similar to the Wow! Signal, although two-orders of magnitude less intense and in multiple locations. Despite the similarities, these signals are easily identifiable as small interstellar clouds of cold hydrogen (HI) in the galaxy. We hypothesize that the Wow! Signal was caused by a sudden brightening of the hydrogen line in these clouds triggered by a strong transient radiation source, such as a magnetar flare or a soft gamma repeater (SGR). A maser flare or superradiance mechanisms can produce stimulated emission consistent with the Wow! Signal. Our hypothesis explains all observed properties of the Wow! Signal, proposes a new source of false positives in technosignature searches, and suggests that the Wow! Signal could be the first recorded event of an astronomical maser-like flare in the hydrogen line.

arXiv comments
22 pages, 8 figures, submitted to ApJ
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
astro-ph.HEHigh Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Aug 2024 to Aug 2024. Found in 3 HN submissions from Aug 2024 to Aug 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • The actual paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08513 It certainly sounds like the first plausible explanation for the signal, though if this is credible it's remarkable it took nearly 50 years.

      TillEView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.