<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LiCoEval: Evaluating LLMs on License Compliance in Code Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.02487/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.02487/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LiCoEval: Evaluating LLMs on License Compliance in Code Generation — mentioned by leonidasrup</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49752970</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2408.02487:49752970</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 11:44:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;LLMs can output near-exact segments of copyrighted code used for training. https://arxiv.org/html/2408.02487v3 I wonder how would Microsoft react if someone would synthesize a code solution based on Windows source code. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_Source_Initiative&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.02487/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>LiCoEval: Evaluating LLMs on License Compliance in Code Generation — mentioned by bilekas</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46119870</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2408.02487:46119870</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 10:47:56 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This particular case appears to me to be a straight derivative at best but I&amp;#x27;m by no means an expert on copyright laws. That&amp;#x27;s not to say there hasn&amp;#x27;t already been more direct cases with set examples [1], from an author directly who would have a better right to claim than I [2], it&amp;#x27;s not even a stretch to see how it can happen. [1] https://arxiv.org/html/2408.02487v3 [2] https://x.com/DocSparse/status/1581461734665367554&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2408.02487/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
