<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The NANOGrav 15 yr data set: Posterior predictive checks for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.20510/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.20510/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The NANOGrav 15 yr data set: Posterior predictive checks for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays — mentioned by PaulHoule</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41161206</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2407.20510:41161206</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 13:29:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;See https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/488/1/401/5521897 for an open access paper that covers the Pulsar Timing Array/Supermassive Black Hole connection also I think this is the latest PTA paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20510 where they seem to see the signal they&amp;#x27;d expect to see from a gravitational wave background but they can&amp;#x27;t rule out that that it&amp;#x27;s a product of noise in the individual pulsar spins until they collect enough data to see signs of correlation between pulsars (e.g. I guess that means spinning down SMB emit coherent radiation over a 100,000-year time scale) Click on the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.20510/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.HE</category></item></channel></rss>
