<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Exploring the Use of Abusive Generative AI Models on Civitai · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.12876/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.12876/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Exploring the Use of Abusive Generative AI Models on Civitai — mentioned by BoorishBears</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44070183</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2407.12876:44070183</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 05:41:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I mean we&amp;#x27;re in the comment section of a provider removing models primarily used to make non-consensual porn of celebrities (https://arxiv.org/html/2407.12876v1), then talking about how crypto is the answer. Visa and co are a cartel, a lot of the pressure Civitai is facing is unreasonable, but even a broken clock is right twice a day: and they had a lot of problematic content. Even if they turn to crypto, this is a change they shouldn&amp;#x27;t walk back, or other providers are probably going to turn on them too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.12876/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SI</category></item></channel></rss>
