arXiv:2407.11004cs.CL
The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
Large pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: employing top-of-the-line models often requires paying thousands of dollars for API calls, while the resulting datasets are static and challenging to audit. To address these challenges, we propose a simple alternative: rather than directly querying labels from pretrained models, we task models to generate programs that can produce labels. These programs can be stored and applied locally, re-used and extended, and cost orders of magnitude less. Our system, Alchemist, obtains comparable to or better performance than large language model-based annotation in a range of tasks for a fraction of the cost: on average, improvements amount to a 12.9% enhancement while the total labeling costs across all datasets are reduced by a factor of approximately 500x.
This reminds me of a paper: "The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators" https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11004 In essence, LLMs are quite good at writing the code to properly parse large amounts of unstructured text, rather than what a lot of people seem…
knowaveragejoeView on HNParent context