HackerPapers

arXiv:2407.10930cs.CL

Fine-Tuning and Prompt Optimization: Two Great Steps that Work Better Together

Dilara Soylu, Christopher Potts, Omar Khattab

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems are increasingly taking the form of sophisticated modular pipelines, e.g., Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), where each module may involve a distinct Language Model (LM) and an associated prompt template. These compound systems often lack intermediate labels or gradient flow to optimize each module, making their end-to-end optimization challenging. Here we seek strategies to optimize both the module-level LM weights and the associated prompt templates of such systems to maximize a downstream task metric. We propose for the first time combining the weight and prompt optimization strategies to optimize a modular LM pipeline by alternating between the two to get the same LM to teach itself. In experiments with multi-hop QA, mathematical reasoning, and feature-based classification using mistral-7b, llama-2-7b, and llama-3-8b, these BetterTogether strategies optimizing the weights and prompts of a pipeline together outperform directly optimizing weights alone and prompts alone by up to 60% and 6%, respectively, on average across LMs and tasks. BetterTogether optimizer is released in DSPy at http://dspy.ai

arXiv comments
EMNLP 2024
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Oct 2024 to Oct 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Do AI companies work? 1 comment

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.