<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Large Language Model-based FMRI Encoding of Language Functions for Subjects with Neurocognitive Disorder · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.10376/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.10376/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Large Language Model-based FMRI Encoding of Language Functions for Subjects with Neurocognitive Disorder — mentioned by probably_wrong</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43482467</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2407.10376:43482467</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:10:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;My mildly grumpy opinion: this is not the first paper to show correlation between brain activity and the layers of a transformer. I know that Wang et. al (2024) have done it last year[1], but I doubt they&amp;#x27;re the only ones - I just have them in my head because I was reading their paper last week. Bonus fact: Wang et. al&amp;#x27;s paper also shows that test scores are a relevant factor in said correlation. The point that always comes to mind is: correlation does not imply causation. I guess the main contribution would be a better mapping of the areas of the brain associated with speech production, but…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.10376/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>q-bio.NC</category></item></channel></rss>
