GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests — mentioned by coldtea

Tue, 10 Feb 2026 23:30:46 GMT

>Not even close. "Neural networks" in code are nothing like real neurons in real biology Hence the simplified. The weights encoding learning and inteconnectedness and nonlinear activation and distributed representation of knowledge is already an approximation, even if the human architecture is different and more elaborate. Whether the omitted parts are essential or not, is debatable. “Equations of motion are nothing like real planets" either, but they capture enough to predict and model their motion. >The "turing test" doesn't exist. Turing talked about a thought experiment in the very early…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests — HN submission

Sun, 25 Aug 2024 21:18:44 GMT

GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests

3 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests · HackerPapers discussions

GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests — mentioned by coldtea

GPT-4 is judged more human than humans in displaced and inverted Turing tests — HN submission