<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>eyeballvul: a future-proof benchmark for vulnerability detection in the wild · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.08708/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.08708/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>eyeballvul: a future-proof benchmark for vulnerability detection in the wild — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48803408</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2407.08708:48803408</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 11:53:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Ask HN: Are there good security benchmarks for LLMs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m looking for this myself but figured it&amp;#x27;s good to have an actual discussion about this. I&amp;#x27;m pretty new to the benchmarking side of LLMs. For example, I looked at eyeballvull [1]. It seems promising but I don&amp;#x27;t see wide support for example. I respect the author for still committing. A benchmark where an agent scans a repo in full is what I&amp;#x27;m looking for. But then I also wondered: maybe there are others out there that I haven&amp;#x27;t been aware of yet. And, at the risk of potentially being flooded, for people that are curious about security aware software engineering with agents (or without them…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;7 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.08708/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>eyeballvul: a future-proof benchmark for vulnerability detection in the wild — mentioned by summarity</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47638016</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2407.08708:47638016</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:11:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Already happend: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08708&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.08708/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item><item><title>eyeballvul: a future-proof benchmark for vulnerability detection in the wild — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41131720</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2407.08708:41131720</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 17:57:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Eyeballvul: A future-proof benchmark for vulnerability detection in the wild&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.08708/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
