HackerPapers

arXiv:2407.07757cs.CY

Can ChatGPT Pass a Theory of Computing Course?

Matei A. Golesteanu, Garrett B. Vowinkel, Ryan E. Dougherty

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have had considerable difficulty when prompted with mathematical questions, especially those within theory of computing (ToC) courses. In this paper, we detail two experiments regarding our own ToC course and the ChatGPT LLM. For the first, we evaluated ChatGPT's ability to pass our own ToC course's exams. For the second, we created a database of sample ToC questions and responses to accommodate other ToC offerings' choices for topics and structure. We scored each of ChatGPT's outputs on these questions. Overall, we determined that ChatGPT can pass our ToC course, and is adequate at understanding common formal definitions and answering "simple"-style questions, e.g., true/false and multiple choice. However, ChatGPT often makes nonsensical claims in open-ended responses, such as proofs.

arXiv comments
Accepted to SIGCSE Virtual 2024
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CYComputers and Society

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jul 2024 to Jul 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.