<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quantitative Criteria for Defining Planets · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.07590/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.07590/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Quantitative Criteria for Defining Planets — mentioned by notarealllama</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40938216</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2407.07590:40938216</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:23:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Tangentally, I came across this preprint today about sensible definitions for planets, as IAU doesn&amp;#x27;t actually call exoplanets &amp;quot;planets&amp;quot;, and there&amp;#x27;s some unclarity re hydrostatic equilibrium (&amp;quot;how round&amp;quot;) and especially the &amp;quot;clearing the path&amp;quot; / orbital dominance Quantitative Criteria for Defining Planets (UCLA) https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07590&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.07590/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.EP</category></item></channel></rss>
