<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ultra-Lightweight Collaborative Mapping for Robot Swarms · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.03136/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.03136/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Ultra-Lightweight Collaborative Mapping for Robot Swarms — mentioned by godelski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41822898</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2407.03136:41822898</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:38:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03136 Code (broken link): https://github.com/ETH-PBL/Nano-C-SLAM ETH-PBL&amp;#x27;s page (https://github.com/ETH-PBL/) Does not have a project with similar naming though there is NanoSLAM and Nano_Swarm_Mapping. The former is associated with the paper &amp;quot;NanoSLAM: Enabling Fully Onboard SLAM for Tiny Robots&amp;quot; and the latter with &amp;quot;Fully Onboard SLAM for Distributed Mapping With a Swarm of Nano-Drones&amp;quot; My guess is that they haven&amp;#x27;t gotten it through review yet and that&amp;#x27;s why. Could be for many reasons, I&amp;#x27;m not a domain expert here so I&amp;#x27;ll reserve judgement, but review can…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2407.03136/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.RO</category></item></channel></rss>
