https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.18786/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42864958urn:hackerpapers:mention:2406.18786:42864958Wed, 29 Jan 2025 14:00:53 GMT<p>&gt; for x86-64 CPUs it is very unlikely that a load value predictor can be worthwhile I think you&#x27;re making a good point about immediate encodings probably making ARM code more amenable to LVP, but I&#x27;m not sure I totally buy this statement. If you take some random x86 program, chances are there are still many loads that are very very predictable. There&#x27;s a very recent ISCA&#x27;24 paper[^1] about this (which also happens to be half-attributed to authors from Intel PARL!): &gt; [...] we first study the static load instructions that repeatedly fetch the same value from the same load address across the…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.18786/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.ARhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41173293urn:hackerpapers:submission:2406.18786:41173293Tue, 06 Aug 2024 17:48:43 GMT<p>Improving Performance and Power by Safely Eliminating Load Instruction Execution</p><p></p><p>1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.18786/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.AR