<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RES-Q: Evaluating Code-Editing Large Language Model Systems at the Repository Scale · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.16801/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.16801/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>RES-Q: Evaluating Code-Editing Large Language Model Systems at the Repository Scale — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40792231</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2406.16801:40792231</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:01:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;RES-Q: A New Benchmark for Differentiating Frontier Model Capability&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#x27;ve developed RES-Q, a benchmark for assessing how well large language model (LLM) systems can edit code repositories based on handcrafted natural language instructions. Our goal was to create a more nuanced evaluation tool as traditional LLM benchmarks approach saturation. Instead of the standard prompt-response format, we evaluate LLMs as part of an LLM-based repository-editing system, requiring precise instruction following, tool use, and sequential decision making. Key findings from our study: 1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperformed GPT-4o by 12% on RES-Q, despite 1% performance difference on…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.16801/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
