<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantization · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.11838/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.11838/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantization — mentioned by schopra909</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49735039</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2406.11838:49735039</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:43:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just skimmed the paper (haven&amp;#x27;t seen this before). Might need to read more carefully, but at first glance I don&amp;#x27;t understand their intuition why the &amp;quot;Markovian property limits the model’s ability to fully utilize the generation trajectory&amp;quot;. When it comes to multi-resolution training (e.g. matryoshka training), there are precedents that don&amp;#x27;t require this AR formulation. They cite MAR (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.11838), which I think is a much clearer articulation of &amp;quot;autoregressive diffusion&amp;quot;. MAR uses an autoregressive base (like an LLM) and staples on a small MLP on-top that&amp;#x27;s trained as a…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.11838/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item><item><title>Autoregressive Image Generation without Vector Quantization — mentioned by zaptrem</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43480074</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2406.11838:43480074</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:40:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Token by token diffusion was done by MAR https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11838 and Fluid (scaled up MAR) https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13863 When you randomly pick the locations they found it worked okay, but doing it in raster order (left to right, top to bottom) they found it didn&amp;#x27;t work as well. We tried it for music and found it was vulnerable to compounding error and lots of oddness relating to the fragility of continuous space CFG.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.11838/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
