<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.10279/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.10279/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs — mentioned by simonw</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45939976</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2406.10279:45939976</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 19:35:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#x27;s another one that went un-cited: &amp;gt; When you ask AI to generate code with dependencies, it hallucinates non-existent packages 19.7% of the time. One. In. Five. &amp;gt; Researchers generated 2.23 million packages across various prompts. 440,445 were complete fabrications. Including 205,474 unique packages that simply don’t exist. That looks like this report from June 2024: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10279 Here&amp;#x27;s the thing: the quoted numbers are totals across 16 early-2024 models, and most of those hallucinations came from models with names like CodeLlama 34B Python and WizardCoder 7B Python…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.10279/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs — mentioned by dijksterhuis</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43664042</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2406.10279:43664042</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:06:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;socket article seems to mostly be a review of this arXiv preprint paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.10279 there’s also some info from Python software foundation folks in the register article, so it’s not just a socket pitch article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.10279/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>We Have a Package for You! A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41703726</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2406.10279:41703726</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 01:06:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A Comprehensive Analysis of Package Hallucinations by Code Generating LLMs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;31 points; 9 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.10279/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
