HackerPapers

arXiv:2406.04470cs.CV

DiffuSyn Bench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Real-World Complexities with Diffusion-Generated Synthetic Benchmarks

Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Feb 2025 to Feb 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Agree wholeheartedly. Modern OCR is astonishingly good, more importantly it's deterministically so. It's failure modes, when it's unable to read the text, are recognizably failures. Results for VLM accuracy & precision are not good. https://arxiv.org/html/2406.04470v1#S4

      cratermoonView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.