<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.04391/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.04391/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Why Has Predicting Downstream Capabilities of Frontier AI Models with Scale Remained Elusive? — mentioned by pizza</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40701702</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2406.04391:40701702</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:02:48 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Eh, I don&amp;#x27;t think that&amp;#x27;s their position: &amp;gt; nothing in this paper should be interpreted as claiming that large language models cannot display emergent abilities; rather, our message is that some previously claimed emergent abilities appear to be mirages induced by researcher analyses imo their paper&amp;#x27;s position is - downstream task metric jumps in accuracy don&amp;#x27;t imply sudden changes in pretrain loss - you can cherry pick metrics to show the sudden appearance of emergent abilities - model scale is not enough to explain emergent abilities because you can scale up one model family and not get them…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2406.04391/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
