<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The rising costs of training frontier AI models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.21015/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.21015/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The rising costs of training frontier AI models — mentioned by windexh8er</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49863273</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.21015:49863273</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 04:07:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s two things here: 1) you clearly don&amp;#x27;t understand the argument and 2) LLMs are one of the few technologies that doesn&amp;#x27;t get any cheaper as it scales (totality, not just the cherry picked inference efficiency argument you&amp;#x27;ve tried to make). In fact it gets more expensive because it scales linearly with demand and resources aren&amp;#x27;t infinite, as I&amp;#x27;d hope you could understand. Also, training costs are never ending so a model that costs 10s of millions of dollars may never yield a profit based on the hardware spend, training time and lack of inference profits before a better model hits the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.21015/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>The rising costs of training frontier AI models — mentioned by happy_dog1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46669275</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.21015:46669275</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 16:42:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think we have to be careful when assuming that model capabilities will continue to grow at the same rate they have grown in recent years. It is very well-documented their growth in recent years has been accompanied by an exponential increase in the cost of building these models, see for example (of many examples) [1]. These costs include not just the cost of GPUs but also the cost for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which is not cheap either -- there is a reason that SurgeAI has over $1 billion in annual revenue (and ScaleAI was doing quite well before they were purchased…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.21015/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item><item><title>The rising costs of training frontier AI models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40561651</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2405.21015:40561651</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 11:35:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Rising Costs of Training Frontier AI Models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.21015/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
