<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Deep Grokking: Would Deep Neural Networks Generalize Better? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19454/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19454/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Deep Grokking: Would Deep Neural Networks Generalize Better? — mentioned by HarHarVeryFunny</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40569452</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.19454:40569452</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:38:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a recent paper here where they&amp;#x27;ve seen in a deeper model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19454 It&amp;#x27;s a bit surprising that apparently this hasn&amp;#x27;t been done before - to see how universal of a phenomenon this is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.19454/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
