HackerPapers

arXiv:2405.15556cs.LG

Certifiably Robust RAG against Retrieval Corruption

Chong Xiang, Tong Wu, Zexuan Zhong, David Wagner, Danqi Chen, Prateek Mittal

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is susceptible to retrieval corruption attacks, where malicious passages injected into retrieval results can lead to inaccurate model responses. We propose RobustRAG, the first defense framework with certifiable robustness against retrieval corruption attacks. The key insight of RobustRAG is an isolate-then-aggregate strategy: we isolate passages into disjoint groups, generate LLM responses based on the concatenated passages from each isolated group, and then securely aggregate these responses for a robust output. To instantiate RobustRAG, we design keyword-based and decoding-based algorithms for securely aggregating unstructured text responses. Notably, RobustRAG achieves certifiable robustness: for certain queries in our evaluation datasets, we can formally certify non-trivial lower bounds on response quality -- even against an adaptive attacker with full knowledge of the defense and the ability to arbitrarily inject a bounded number of malicious passages. We evaluate RobustRAG on the tasks of open-domain question-answering and free-form long text generation and demonstrate its effectiveness across three datasets and three LLMs.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning cs.CLComputation and Language cs.CRCryptography and Security

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2024 to May 2024. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.