<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Mosaic Memory of Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.15523/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.15523/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Mosaic Memory of Large Language Models — mentioned by johndough</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48990546</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.15523:48990546</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:46:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not arguing that Kimi did not distill Opus or Sonnet (which they almost certainly have, as opposed to Fable or Sol). I am arguing that even if they did not distill, the model could still identify itself as Opus or Sonnet. That being said, I&amp;#x27;d like to point out a few things: - The second link (to claude-sonnet-4-2025051) had 17k matches, not just 3k. - grep.app does not index the entirety of GitHub, so the real number of occurrences of model identifiers is even higher. SourceGraph has a larger index, but the number is so high that it exceeds their result limit of 10k…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.15523/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
