<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Solving the Einstein Equations Numerically · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.06035/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.06035/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Solving the Einstein Equations Numerically — mentioned by hoseja</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41903534</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.06035:41903534</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 12:39:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;As with all such articles, there is no real help with getting through the hurdle. Very surface-level, sounding like AI summary at times. Also, AFAICT, nobody has yet actually worked out spacetime with masses properly, right? Where masses influence and are influenced by space, each other and time, all at the same &amp;quot;time&amp;quot;, in general? Edit: Looks like people are working on it? (for mergers of binary stars) https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06035&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.06035/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>gr-qc</category></item></channel></rss>
