<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.00451/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.00451/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning — mentioned by ankit219</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42566819</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2405.00451:42566819</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 16:02:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The other comment posted YT videos where Open AI researchers are talking about TTC. So, I am wrong. That $200 subscription is just because the number of tokens generated are huge when CoT is involved. Usually inference output is capped at 2000-4000 tokens (max of ~8192) or so, but they cannot do it with o1 and all the thinking tokens involved. This is true with all the approaches - next token prediction, TTC with beam/lookahead search, or MCTS + TTC. If you specify the output token range as high and induce a model to think before it answers, you will get better results on smaller/local models…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2405.00451/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
