HackerPapers

arXiv:2404.17605q-bio.OT

Autonomous LLM-driven research from data to human-verifiable research papers

Tal Ifargan, Lukas Hafner, Maor Kern, Ori Alcalay, Roy Kishony

Abstract

As AI promises to accelerate scientific discovery, it remains unclear whether fully AI-driven research is possible and whether it can adhere to key scientific values, such as transparency, traceability and verifiability. Mimicking human scientific practices, we built data-to-paper, an automation platform that guides interacting LLM agents through a complete stepwise research process, while programmatically back-tracing information flow and allowing human oversight and interactions. In autopilot mode, provided with annotated data alone, data-to-paper raised hypotheses, designed research plans, wrote and debugged analysis codes, generated and interpreted results, and created complete and information-traceable research papers. Even though research novelty was relatively limited, the process demonstrated autonomous generation of de novo quantitative insights from data. For simple research goals, a fully-autonomous cycle can create manuscripts which recapitulate peer-reviewed publications without major errors in about 80-90%, yet as goal complexity increases, human co-piloting becomes critical for assuring accuracy. Beyond the process itself, created manuscripts too are inherently verifiable, as information-tracing allows to programmatically chain results, methods and data. Our work thereby demonstrates a potential for AI-driven acceleration of scientific discovery while enhancing, rather than jeopardizing, traceability, transparency and verifiability.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
q-bio.OTOther Quantitative Biology cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 1 thread, from May 2024 to May 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Thanks everyone for engagement and discussion. Following the range of comments, just a few thoughts: 1. Traceability, transparency and verifiability. I think the key question for me is not only whether AI can accelerate science, but rather how we can use AI to accelerate science…

      roykishonyView on HNParent context

    • I encourage you to look at the manuscript we have put on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17605 and go through the thread on X: https://x.com/RoyKishony/status/1785319021329674593 We will be happy to explain and even correct ourselves, if needed, if approached in a civil…

      ttaalloossView on HNParent context

    • Thanks so much for these thorough comments. You suggested some directions for more complex analysis that could be done on this data - I would be so curious to see what you get if you could take the time to try out running data-to-paper as a co-pilot on your own - you can then…

      roykishonyView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.