<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.13076/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.13076/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generations — mentioned by thesz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49696068</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2404.13076:49696068</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:56:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; all were able to find every problem planted there, with fairly little steering, and no spoilers. Given that LLMs prefer output of LLMs (of the same LLM and of others) [1], can it be the case that they generate &amp;quot;hard challenges&amp;quot; from the manifold of challenges solvable by (other) LLMs? [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13076&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.13076/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
