<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.09894/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.09894/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Glitch Tokens in Large Language Models: Categorization Taxonomy and Effective Detection — mentioned by spacecadet</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42827306</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2404.09894:42827306</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 02:59:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Just used the glitch token attack in a CTF a week ago. The paper is worth a read and there is a repo out there as well that makes the attack straight forward- but implementing it yourself is also something worth doing. I will add that the author thinking no one had done this with deepseek is unlikely, I run this against models every week out of curiosity or for work, not deepseek yet- but considering the adversarial ML community is pretty packed, someone likely had and just didn&amp;#x27;t write about it. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09894 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.15052…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.09894/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
