arXiv:2404.07544cs.CL
From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable Regressor When Given In-Context Examples
Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.
Abstract
We analyze how well pre-trained large language models (e.g., Llama2, GPT-4, Claude 3, etc) can do linear and non-linear regression when given in-context examples, without any additional training or gradient updates. Our findings reveal that several large language models (e.g., GPT-4, Claude 3) are able to perform regression tasks with a performance rivaling (or even outperforming) that of traditional supervised methods such as Random Forest, Bagging, or Gradient Boosting. For example, on the challenging Friedman #2 regression dataset, Claude 3 outperforms many supervised methods such as AdaBoost, SVM, Random Forest, KNN, or Gradient Boosting. We then investigate how well the performance of large language models scales with the number of in-context exemplars. We borrow from the notion of regret from online learning and empirically show that LLMs are capable of obtaining a sub-linear regret.
A good read if the How and Why NNs are working is of interest. Also the HN discussion [1] about this paper [2] is related from my point of view. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40019217 [2] "From Words to Numbers: Your Large Language Model Is Secretly A Capable…
qriosView on HNParent context