<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Characterising the Higgs boson with ATLAS data from Run 2 of the LHC · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.05498/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.05498/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Characterising the Higgs boson with ATLAS data from Run 2 of the LHC — mentioned by dguest</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39981774</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2404.05498:39981774</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 17:25:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t know where you get 5.9 sigma but that might have been the confidence at the time it was discovered in 2012. Since then the LHC took a lot more data and the confidence is more like 20 sigma. That said, these days it&amp;#x27;s harder to find a paper that gives a confidence for discovery, since they are all quoting the signal strength with respect to the standard model prediction. They generally measure this within about 5%, see for example https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05498&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.05498/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>hep-ex</category></item></channel></rss>
