HackerPapers

arXiv:2404.04671cs.CL

PhyloLM : Inferring the Phylogeny of Large Language Models and Predicting their Performances in Benchmarks

Nicolas Yax, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Stefano Palminteri

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

This paper introduces PhyloLM, a method adapting phylogenetic algorithms to Large Language Models (LLMs) to explore whether and how they relate to each other and to predict their performance characteristics. Our method calculates a phylogenetic distance metric based on the similarity of LLMs' output. The resulting metric is then used to construct dendrograms, which satisfactorily capture known relationships across a set of 111 open-source and 45 closed models. Furthermore, our phylogenetic distance predicts performance in standard benchmarks, thus demonstrating its functional validity and paving the way for a time and cost-effective estimation of LLM capabilities. To sum up, by translating population genetic concepts to machine learning, we propose and validate a tool to evaluate LLM development, relationships and capabilities, even in the absence of transparent training information.

arXiv comments
The project code is available at https://github.com/Nicolas-Yax/PhyloLM . Published as https://iclr.cc/virtual/2025/poster/28195 at ICLR 2025. A code demo is available at https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1agNE52eUevgdJ3KL3ytv5Y9JBbfJRYqd
Journal reference
ICLR 2025
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.LGMachine Learning q-bio.PEPopulations and Evolution

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2025 to Apr 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.