<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.03723/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.03723/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits — mentioned by Strilanc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42078985</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2404.03723:42078985</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 17:47:10 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How hard do you expect it would be to improve the heralded infidelity from 45% to 10%? In figure 3 of the paper [1] the heralded infidelity of entanglement is reported to be around 45%. That&amp;#x27;s not good enough for computation, but it&amp;#x27;s less than 50% which means it makes purification to arbitrarily low infidelity possible. However, the conversion rates would be pretty brutal for such a high infidelity start (e.g. millions of physical pairs consumed per logical pair good enough for use in a fault tolerant computation e.g. a target logical infidelity of 1e-6 or 1e-9). 1…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2404.03723/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
