HackerPapers

arXiv:2403.18932cs.CL

Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models: What Is Said and How It Is Said

Yejin Bang, Delong Chen, Nayeon Lee, Pascale Fung

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We propose to measure political bias in LLMs by analyzing both the content and style of their generated content regarding political issues. Existing benchmarks and measures focus on gender and racial biases. However, political bias exists in LLMs and can lead to polarization and other harms in downstream applications. In order to provide transparency to users, we advocate that there should be fine-grained and explainable measures of political biases generated by LLMs. Our proposed measure looks at different political issues such as reproductive rights and climate change, at both the content (the substance of the generation) and the style (the lexical polarity) of such bias. We measured the political bias in eleven open-sourced LLMs and showed that our proposed framework is easily scalable to other topics and is explainable.

arXiv comments
16 pages
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jul 2025 to Jul 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

  1. Grok 4 Launch [video] 1 comment
    • There is a real case that "LLMs have a liberal bias" https://arxiv.org/html/2403.18932v1 so a project of a "conservative LLM" would be interesting. If conservatives have anything to be proud of it is being a long tradition going back to at least Edmund Burke which would say you…

      PaulHouleView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.