<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14238/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14238/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection — mentioned by lossolo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44426993</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.14238:44426993</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 19:33:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote about it around a year ago here: &amp;quot;There weren&amp;#x27;t really any advancements from around 2018. The majority of the &amp;#x27;advancements&amp;#x27; were in the amount of parameters, training data, and its applications. What was the GPT-3 to ChatGPT transition? It involved fine-tuning, using specifically crafted training data. What changed from GPT-3 to GPT-4? It was the increase in the number of parameters, improved training data, and the addition of another modality. From GPT-4 to GPT-40? There was more optimization and the introduction of a new modality. The only thing left that could further improve…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14238/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection — mentioned by lossolo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41531160</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.14238:41531160</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:36:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;O1 seems like a variant of RLRF https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14238&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14238/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Reinforcement Learning from Reflective Feedback (RLRF): Aligning and Improving LLMs via Fine-Grained Self-Reflection — mentioned by lossolo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41526039</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.14238:41526039</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:58:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s because there is nothing novel here from an architectural point of view. Again, the secret sauce is only in the training data. O1 seems like a variant of RLRF https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14238 Soon you will see similar models from competitors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14238/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
