<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lean4Lean: Verifying a Typechecker for Lean, in Lean · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14064/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14064/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Lean4Lean: Verifying a Typechecker for Lean, in Lean — mentioned by Jblx2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49577393</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.14064:49577393</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 15:18:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You write your Lean4 type-checker in a way that is amenable to formal proof. And then verify properties of your type-checker. Like Lean4Lean. https://arxiv.org/html/2403.14064v3 https://github.com/digama0/lean4lean/tree/master&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14064/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item><item><title>Lean4Lean: Verifying a Typechecker for Lean, in Lean — mentioned by digama0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42408480</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.14064:42408480</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 14:02:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Should I introduce you to https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14064 ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.14064/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.PL</category></item></channel></rss>
