<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Modified interferometer to measure anyonic braiding statistics · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.12139/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.12139/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Modified interferometer to measure anyonic braiding statistics — mentioned by gradschoolfail</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40550551</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.12139:40550551</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2024 01:08:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for keeping me on my feet! You probably mean the following (note the nuance and date of the first one): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.12139.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-020-1019-1 I still think my point, originally about 1 electron split into 2 locations, or “ends” of string (but devolving to a complaint about casual ignorance of the central issue in publications) hasn’t been completely destroyed, because here you are measuring interference of 2 anyons, somewhat like measuring the interference of a photon “with itself” in a double split experiment. The broader point could…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.12139/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cond-mat.mes-hall</category></item></channel></rss>
