HackerPapers

arXiv:2403.08462cs.CL

Grammar as a Behavioral Biometric: Using Cognitively Motivated Grammar Models for Authorship Verification

Andrea Nini, Oren Halvani, Lukas Graner, Sophie Titze, Valerio Gherardi, Shunichi Ishihara

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Authorship Verification (AV) is a key area of research in digital text forensics, which addresses the fundamental question of whether two texts were written by the same person. Numerous computational approaches have been proposed over the last two decades in an attempt to address this challenge. However, existing AV methods often suffer from high complexity, low explainability and especially from a lack of clear scientific justification. We propose a simpler method based on modeling the grammar of an author following Cognitive Linguistics principles. These models are used to calculate $λ_G$ (LambdaG): the ratio of the likelihoods of a document given the candidate's grammar versus given a reference population's grammar. Our empirical evaluation, conducted on twelve datasets and compared against seven baseline methods, demonstrates that LambdaG achieves superior performance, including against several neural network-based AV methods. LambdaG is also robust to small variations in the composition of the reference population and provides interpretable visualizations, enhancing its explainability. We argue that its effectiveness is due to the method's compatibility with Cognitive Linguistics theories predicting that a person's grammar is a behavioral biometric.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
Humanit Soc Sci Commun 13, 455 (2026)
DOI
doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06340-3
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Apr 2026 to Apr 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • The article seems quite editorialized, shifting between describing "large-scale AI models" and "neural network-based approaches". The underlying paper itself is more precise, comparing against LUAR, a 2021 method based on bert-style embeddings (i.e. a model with 82M parameters…

      spindump8930View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.