<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Algorithmic progress in language models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.05812/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.05812/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Algorithmic progress in language models — mentioned by tmnvdb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42990624</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.05812:42990624</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 13:42:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is incorrect, there are real effiency gains. Slightly old by the standards of this field, but a good overview: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05812&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.05812/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Algorithmic progress in language models — mentioned by ctoth</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40116049</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.05812:40116049</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:41:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; a bombshell scientific paper recently cast serious doubt on AI developers’ ability to continue to dramatically improve their models’ performance. This is the problem with this type of (AI isn&amp;#x27;t real, I promise!) writing. Each and every single time. This bombshell scientific result that he links to? Is Gary Marcus lamenting about a single paper, specific to a single architecture, which primarily shows how quickly algorithmic improvements are bringing down energy costs[0]. We get it. You don&amp;#x27;t like AI. But you don&amp;#x27;t have to lie about it, unless of course you are Gary Marcus and this is how…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.05812/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Algorithmic progress in language models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39692040</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2403.05812:39692040</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:00:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Algorithmic Progress in Language Models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.05812/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item><item><title>Algorithmic progress in language models — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39678224</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2403.05812:39678224</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:20:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Algorithmic Progress in Language Models&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.05812/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
