<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How Far Are We from Intelligent Visual Deductive Reasoning? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.04732/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.04732/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>How Far Are We from Intelligent Visual Deductive Reasoning? — mentioned by p1esk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39675454</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2403.04732:39675454</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 02:09:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;To solve self-driving we need two things: 1. Deep and detailed understanding of how the world works. We are just starting to make real progress there (GPT-4), and more work is needed [1]. 2. Reliability. A model should make significantly fewer mistakes than humans would make in similar scenarios, on average. This includes factual and logical mistakes, as well as hallucinations. I expect the main improvements GPT-5 will bring are improvements in exactly these two areas. The first one is likely to come from training on huge video datasets (next frame prediction objective), and the second one…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.04732/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>How Far Are We from Intelligent Visual Deductive Reasoning? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39660780</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2403.04732:39660780</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:17:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;How far are we from intelligent visual deductive reasoning?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;124 points; 118 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2403.04732/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
