<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Flower Calculus · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.15174/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.15174/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Flower Calculus — mentioned by emorning4</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44903807</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.15174:44903807</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 18:20:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;That is an unreasonable assumption.&amp;lt; It definitely is. Neither language nor writing is required to perform logic, see (Existential graph)[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_graph]. You can perform automated logic by putting/removing beads on a colored tile floor, see (Flower Calculus)[https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15174].&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.15174/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
