HackerPapers

arXiv:2402.12147cs.CL

Surprising Efficacy of Fine-Tuned Transformers for Fact-Checking over Larger Language Models

Vinay Setty

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the challenges associated with establishing an end-to-end fact-checking pipeline in a real-world context, covering over 90 languages. Our real-world experimental benchmarks demonstrate that fine-tuning Transformer models specifically for fact-checking tasks, such as claim detection and veracity prediction, provide superior performance over large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, GPT-3.5-Turbo, and Mistral-7b. However, we illustrate that LLMs excel in generative tasks such as question decomposition for evidence retrieval. Through extensive evaluation, we show the efficacy of fine-tuned models for fact-checking in a multilingual setting and complex claims that include numerical quantities.

arXiv comments
Accepted in SIGIR 2024 (industry track)
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CLComputation and Language cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Apr 2024 to Apr 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • So using LLMs to fact-check LLMs with Google results? There are non-LLM fact-checkers out there [1] which aggregate search results from more diverse sources and which are shown to outperform LLMs [2]. [1] https://editor.factiverse.ai [2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12147

      vinni2View on HNParent context

    • Ok but bigger issue is there is evidence that the LLMs are not better than specialized models for fact-checking. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12147

      vinni2View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.