<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Database for the meta-analysis of the social cost of carbon (v2026.1) · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.09125/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.09125/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Database for the meta-analysis of the social cost of carbon (v2026.1) — mentioned by fulafel</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47346518</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.09125:47346518</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 04:39:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is worrying about trivialities. We need to be rapidly phasing out fossils usage to mitigate the climate catastrophe. Which of course requires a much much smaller supply of oil. There should be ~ $250/barrel cost added to the market price to account for externalities (barrel of oil releases 0.43 tons of co2 and avg social cost of carbon from https://arxiv.org/html/2402.09125v3 is $500+/ton)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.09125/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>econ.GN</category></item></channel></rss>
