<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Comprehensive Review of Software and Hardware Energy Efficiency of Video Decoders · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.09001/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.09001/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Comprehensive Review of Software and Hardware Energy Efficiency of Video Decoders — mentioned by testdelacc1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45548728</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.09001:45548728</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 12:44:05 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; power usage, lesser battery life, higher energy bills I like how you padded this list by repeating the same thing thrice. Like, increased power usage is obviously going to lead to higher energy bills. And it’s especially weird because it’s not true? The current SOTA codec AV1 is at a sweet spot for both compression and energy demand (https://arxiv.org/html/2402.09001v1). Consumers are not worse off!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.09001/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>eess.IV</category></item></channel></rss>
