Stringent Tests of Lorentz Invariance Violation from LHAASO Observations of GRB 221009A · HackerPapers discussionshttps://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.06009/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMTStringent Tests of Lorentz Invariance Violation from LHAASO Observations of GRB 221009A — mentioned by btillyhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41813384urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.06009:41813384Fri, 11 Oct 2024 20:26:29 GMT<p>Well, if you want a simple argument from authority, John Carlos Baez&#x27;s confirmation that she&#x27;s right is pretty good. If you want a better one, she very rarely gets any of her facts wrong. Now let&#x27;s go point by point. Is Carlo Rovelli fine with it not being testable, in that he is fine with research continuing even though it can not be tested with up coming experimental set ups? He is arguing for a version of the theory that can&#x27;t be tested, is continuing to do research on it, and presumably thinks that he is doing science. If Sabine was going to expose howe much money was going to these…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.06009/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>astro-ph.HE