<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Distinguishing the Knowable from the Unknowable with Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.03563/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.03563/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Distinguishing the Knowable from the Unknowable with Language Models — mentioned by pizza</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42694462</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2402.03563:42694462</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 06:45:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#x27;s a paper that probed how strongly a model would focus on prompt-supplied tokens when generating a response as a signal that it was trying to use the prompt as the source of information as opposed to knowledge it had been trained on. Ie, how much it was trying to lie based on it assuming that the information in the prompt was true, as opposed to having a rich internal model of the thing that is being verified. It looks like it works, sort of, sometimes, when you have access to the actual labels. The results from this work, in the more real-world unsupervised setting, are better than…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2402.03563/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
