HackerPapers

arXiv:2402.00626cs.CV

Vision-LLMs Can Fool Themselves with Self-Generated Typographic Attacks

Maan Qraitem, Nazia Tasnim, Piotr Teterwak, Kate Saenko, Bryan A. Plummer

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Typographic attacks, adding misleading text to images, can deceive vision-language models (LVLMs). The susceptibility of recent large LVLMs like GPT4-V to such attacks is understudied, raising concerns about amplified misinformation in personal assistant applications. Previous attacks use simple strategies, such as random misleading words, which don't fully exploit LVLMs' language reasoning abilities. We introduce an experimental setup for testing typographic attacks on LVLMs and propose two novel self-generated attacks: (1) Class-based attacks, where the model identifies a similar class to deceive itself, and (2) Reasoned attacks, where an advanced LVLM suggests an attack combining a deceiving class and description. Our experiments show these attacks significantly reduce classification performance by up to 60\% and are effective across different models, including InstructBLIP and MiniGPT4. Code: https://github.com/mqraitem/Self-Gen-Typo-Attack

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CVComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Dec 2025 to Dec 2025.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • typographic attacks against vision-language models are still a thing with more recent models like GPT4-V: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00626

      Jon_LowtekView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.