HackerPapers

arXiv:2401.13770cs.AI

AlphaMapleSAT: An MCTS-based Cube-and-Conquer SAT Solver for Hard Combinatorial Problems

Piyush Jha, Zhengyu Li, Zhengyang Lu, Raymond Zeng, Curtis Bright, Vijay Ganesh

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

This paper introduces AlphaMapleSAT, a Cube-and-Conquer (CnC) parallel SAT solver that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with deductive feedback to efficiently solve challenging combinatorial SAT problems. Traditional lookahead cubing methods, used by solvers such as March, limit their search depth to reduce overhead often resulting in suboptimal partitions. By contrast, AlphaMapleSAT performs a deeper MCTS search guided by deductive rewards from SAT solvers. This approach enables informed exploration of the cubing space while keeping cubing costs low. We demonstrate the efficacy of our technique via extensive evaluations against the widely used and established March cubing solver on three well-known challenging combinatorial benchmarks, including the minimum Kochen-Specker (KS) problem from quantum mechanics, the Murty-Simon Conjecture, and the Ramsey problems from extremal graph theory. We compare AlphaMapleSAT against March using different types of conquering solvers such as SAT Modulo Symmetries (SMS) and SAT+CAS, both built on top of the CaDiCaL SAT solver. We show that in all cases, there is a speedup in elapsed real time (wall clock time) ranging from 1.61x to 7.57x on a 128 core machine for the above-mentioned problems. We also perform cube-level and parallel scaling analysis over 32, 64, and 128 cores, which shows that AlphaMapleSAT outperforms March on all these settings. Our results show that deductively-guided MCTS search technique for cubing in CnC solvers can significantly outperform March on hard combinatorial problems.

arXiv comments
Added more experiments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.AIArtificial Intelligence math.COCombinatorics

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Jan 2024 to Jan 2024.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • Fine, I edited "most" in my previous comment to "many". There are still plenty of examples (even on the first page) where the "runtime" is used to mean algorithmic complexity https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14645 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13770 https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12253…

      eigenketView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.