Mission: Impossible Language Models · HackerPapers discussions

Mission: Impossible Language Models — mentioned by rahimnathwani

Sun, 25 May 2025 19:01:21 GMT

Is that true? This paper claims it is not. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06416

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Mission: Impossible Language Models — mentioned by godelski

Sat, 30 Nov 2024 05:47:11 GMT

> when the alternative is politely (better yet - excitedly) answering the question asked? You kind of are. Gatekeeping is controlling access. Not to be confused with hurdles. I'm more than happy to have more people in "the party." No one is being excluded in the way that isn't also true for any other field. You unfortunately need some level of expertise to be able to understand discussions between experts. But am I stopping you from getting that expertise? No, in fact I'm very happy to lend a hand! Those aren't gates, they're hurdles. You don't need a specific PhD or to go to a good school or…

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

Mission: Impossible Language Models — HN submission

Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:27:15 GMT

Assessing the Learning Limits of LLMs with Synthetic Impossible Languages

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Mission: Impossible Language Models — HN submission

Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:38:50 GMT

Mission: Impossible Language Models

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Mission: Impossible Language Models — HN submission

Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:11:54 GMT

Mission: Impossible Language Models

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

Mission: Impossible Language Models — HN submission

Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:47:54 GMT

Mission: Impossible Language Models

1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.