<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>JWST Observations Reject Unrecognized Crowding of Cepheid Photometry as an Explanation for the Hubble Tension at 8 sigma Confidence · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.04773/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.04773/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>JWST Observations Reject Unrecognized Crowding of Cepheid Photometry as an Explanation for the Hubble Tension at 8 sigma Confidence — mentioned by magicalhippo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39865002</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2401.04773:39865002</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:09:26 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Becky Smethurst, an astrophysicist, goes through how the cosmic distance ladder works and the recent JWST results here[1]. As you say, measurement errors of Cepheid stars has been something scientists considered a possibility, hence why they&amp;#x27;re cross-checking by measuring them in different ways. And, as mentioned in the posted article and the other papers mentioned in the video, it seems that measurement errors are very unlikely to be the culprit. Preprints to the articles Becky mentions are here[2][3][4]. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NeKR7bqolY&amp;amp;t=1330s [2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2401.04773/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>astro-ph.CO</category></item></channel></rss>
